Wednesday, 4 April 2012

Maid's cries cast light on child labor in India



New Delhi:  The girl's screams were brittle and desperate. Neighbors in the suburban housing complex looked up and saw a child crying for help from an upstairs balcony. She was 13 and worked as a maid for a couple who had gone on vacation to Thailand. They had left her locked inside their apartment.

After a firefighter rescued her, the girl described a life akin to slavery, child welfare officials said. Her uncle had sold her to a job placement agency, which sold her to the couple, both doctors. The girl was paid nothing. She said the couple barely fed her and beat her if her work did not meet expectations. She said they used closed-circuit cameras to make certain she did not take extra food.

In India, reported to have more child laborers than any other country in the world, child labor and trafficking are often considered symptoms of poverty: desperately poor families sell their children for work, and some end up as prostitutes or manual laborers.

But the case last week of the 13-year-old maid is a reminder that the exploitation of children is also a symptom of India's rising wealth, as the country's growing middle class has created a surging demand for domestic workers, jobs often filled by children.

The Indian news media, usually a bullhorn for middle-class interests, ran outraged front-page articles. But the case was hardly unique. Last week, an 11-year-old Nepalese girl, working as a servant, said that her employer had beaten her with a rolling pin, according to the police.

Indian law offers limited safeguards and limited enforcement to protect such children, and public attitudes are usually permissive in a society where even in the lowest rungs of the middle class, families often have at least one live-in servant.

"There is a huge, huge demand," said Ravi Kant, a lawyer with Shakti Vahini, a nonprofit group that combats child trafficking. "The demand is so huge that the government is tending toward regulation rather than saying our children should not work but should be in school."

The International Labor Organization has found that India has 12.6 million laborers between the ages of 5 and 14, with roughly 20 percent working as domestic help. Other groups place the figure at 45 million or higher. Unicef has said India has more child laborers than any other country in the world.

Many of these children come from India's poorest states, either through shadowy job placement agencies or by kidnapping. In 2011, more than 32,000 children were reported missing in India, according to government crime statistics.

Mala Bhandari, who runs Childline, a government hot line for child workers, said India's urbanization and the rise of two-income families were driving demand for domestic help. Children are cheaper and more pliant than adults; Ms. Bhandari said a family might pay a child servant only $40 a month, less than half the wage commonly paid to an adult, if such servants are paid at all.

Indian law deems anyone younger than 18 a minor. But the Juvenile Justice Act of 2000 also creates a loophole: Children between 14 and 18 are allowed to work a maximum of six hours a day in nonhazardous work. Children younger than 14 are prohibited from working as servants, a statute that is widely flouted. Employers are required to provide daily education and document the child's daily break hours, though most families ignore such requirements because enforcement is largely nil.

"What happens within the four walls of a home, nobody knows," said Ms. Bhandari, who contended that while abuse was not the norm, it was not rare.

Domestic work employs millions of people in India, most of them adults. India's rich often have a retinue of servants, drivers and other helpers. Mukesh Ambani, the billionaire industrialist, reportedly has several hundred domestic workers in his skyscraper residence in Mumbai, the country's financial capital, with some of his servants trained by one of India's elite hotels. Some Indian families living abroad also take a servant; last month, an Indian maid in New York won a $1.5 million judgment against an Indian diplomat and her husband for abusive treatment.

Societal attitudes toward servants are often shaped by ingrained mores about caste and class. Many servants, especially children, come from poor families among the lower Hindu castes or tribal groups, often from poor states like Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh and West Bengal.

Santosh Desai, a columnist for The Times of India, the country's largest-circulation English-language newspaper, warned in February that India's upper and middle class were growing flabby and indolent through their dependence on cheap household help, and that they also wrongly held "an implicit belief in possessing an intrinsic superiority, an assumed right to lord it over someone lesser."

"As a child nobody dreams of growing up one day and driving somebody else's children to school or washing their clothes," he wrote.

The middle-class families in the housing complex where the 13-year-old girl worked, in the suburb of Dwarka, professed shock over her treatment. Originally from Jharkhand, the girl is now being cared for at a government-run shelter for women. After she was rescued, she was interviewed by counselors with Shakti Vahini, the nonprofit group. They said she told them she had also been required to clean the couple's medical clinic.

They said she also told them of other abuses: On some occasions, the couple reviewed footage from the cameras in the apartment and beat her if they found behavior that displeased them. She said she was provided with two chapatis, pieces of flat bread, as her daily meal. Earlier in the week, the police said they had not yet been able to confirm the presence of cameras in the apartment.

Raj Mangal Prasad, a children's welfare official in New Delhi, said the government was not staffed to carry out raids to look for illegal servants. But if it were, Mr. Prasad estimated, several thousand cases would probably be discovered throughout the capital. He estimated that one household out of 20 employed an under-age servant. "It's plain for everyone to see," he said.

The girl's employers, identified by the police as Dr. Sanjay Verma and Dr. Sumita Verma, were arrested Wednesday after their return to India and remanded to police custody. The police have filed preliminary charges of violations of the Juvenile Justice Act, the Child Labor Prohibition and Regulation Act and other violations of the criminal code.

Their lawyer denied the charges at a bail hearing.

But Mr. Kant, the lawyer with Shakti Vahini, said the courts rarely issued harsh judgments in cases involving the rights of domestic help.

"There is a general feeling that we need these people," Mr. Kant said. "Cases aren't taken so seriously. There is no fear of the law."

US clarifies Hafiz Saeed bounty for information that will lead to arrest



Washington:  Hafiz Saeed's open mocking of the bounty on him has made the US clarify that it wants the Lashkar-e-Taiba founder prosecuted and jailed; that the 10-million-dollar bounty it announced is not for information about Saeed's location, but for information that will lead to his arrest or conviction.

Hafiz Saeed, who is seen as the mastermind of the 26/11 Mumbai attacks in 2008, is a free man and a public figure in Pakistan, and he held a press conference yesterday to underscore that, defying the US' announcement on Monday of a reward on his head as a most-wanted terrorist. 

Saeed held his press conference at a hotel close to the Pakistan army's headquarters in Rawalpindi and said: "If the United States wants to contact me, I am present, they can contact me." He also said that, "I am also ready to face any American court, or wherever there is proof against me."

Quickly the US state department issued a statement that it was actually looking for that evidence that could be used in court to link Saeed to the 26 /11 Mumbai attacks.

"Just to clarify, the $10 million is for information that - not about his location, but information that leads to an arrest or conviction. And this is information that could withstand judicial scrutiny, so I think what's important here is we're not seeking this guy's location. We all know where he is. Every journalist in Pakistan and in the region knows how to find him. But we're looking for information that can be usable to convict him in a court of law," State Department spokesman Mark Toner said when asked about Saeed's public appearance. 

On Wednesday, the Pakistan Foreign Ministry reiterated what it has said often to India - that it needs "concrete evidence" before the Pakistani government will move to arrest Saeed. Hafiz Saeed has been on India's most-wanted list since 2008, but every time it has demanded that Pakistan take action against him, the neighbour has pulled out its stock reply. 
 
Mr Toner said, "What we're looking for, which is people to step forward that can provide that kind of evidence that the Pakistanis can then arrest this individual and try him."
 
Mr Toner denied that the United States was putting pressure on Pakistan at a time when relations between the two countries have been at an all-time low. "It's not to put pressure on any one government. But we wanted to be able to provide Pakistan with the tools that they need to prosecute this individual," he said. 

The US announcement of a bounty raised many eyebrows; the US has faced criticism from all quarters, with experts asking what it hoped to achieve by declaring a bounty for a man who is not in hiding. 

Rahul Gandhi to review Uttar Pradesh poll debacle



New Delhi:  Rahul Gandhi is taking stock. In Uttar Pradesh, where despite his leading the Congress from the front, the party fared very poorly in the assembly elections. Over the next few days starting today, Mr Gandhi will meet state leaders and others who were involved with electioneering in UP to analyse what went wrong and fix things in time for the Lok Sabha elections in 2014. 

In February, immediately after the serious loss of face as elections results showed that the Congress had added but six seats to its tally in the state despite an exhaustive campaign by Mr Gandhi, he had appeared in public to accept responsibility and said that a weak organisational structure in the state had done the party in. "I know I campaigned and led from the front, it is my responsibility...Organisationally we are not where we should be in UP... The fundamentals of the Congress party in UP were weak. Unless we work on those fundamentals, we will remain weak," Mr Gandhi had said candidly. 
 
Seven years of focused work in UP had come to naught and Mr Gandhi has his task cut out. On the top of his UP agenda is meeting Congress candidates who lost, but polled over 20,000 votes. There are almost 160 of those - candidates who could have potentially won. He will also meet his 28 new MLAs in the state, Congress MPs from UP and ministers and people who had zonal charge. Partymen see significance in the fact that Digvijaya Singh, the senior general secretary who had charge of the UP elections, is out of the country and so will not be a part of the UP analysis. The stock-taking was to have been held last week, but was rescheduled to begin today.

Party sources say there is likely to be a fair deal of finger-pointing by Congress leaders. Those who lost say they will bring up critical issues like in-fighting among top leaders and the heartburn in party cadres about candidate selection and "outsiders" being given ticket. Then there controversial statements made by senior ministers like Salman Khurshid, Beni Prasad Verma and others which could have damaged party prospects. 

The poor organisation structure of the Congress in the state, which both Mr Gandhi and his mother and party president Sonia Gandhi have said was a major reason for the Congress UP debacle, begs immediate fixing and Mr Gandhi is expected to begin addressing that post-haste as he analyses UP.

Rahul Gandhi had pulled out all stops in UP this time. Building on the hope handed out by a very good showing in the Lok Sabha elections in 2009, when the Congress got 22 of UP's 80 Parliamentary seats, Mr Gandhi had led a much-hyped, star-studded Congress campaign armed with what the party believed was a winning strategy. It failed to stir the people of UP, who were drawn more to the fresh appeal of another young leader Akhilesh Yadav. His Samajwadi Party posted a spectacular win and the 38-year-old is now the youngest Chief Minister of the state. 
 
In his first post-election analysis, Rahul Gandhi had admitted, "Generally there was a mood for SP, which is very apparent."